 |
Mike Trojan and Associates
Environmental Site Assessment in Austin and throughout Texas
PHP RSS Reader U.S. EPA Homeland Security Research NewsEPA's homeland security research is helping to protect human health and the environment from intentional acts of terror.
The Pathogen Information Catalog (PI Cat) Tool to Support Dose-Response AssessmentsThere are many challenges in assessing health risks from the exposure to microorganisms. Specifically, quality human dose-response data is limited or, in many cases, nonexistent. In order to recommend risk-based cleanup goals, as well as analytical detection limits and environmental decontamination efficacies, there is a need to characterize microbial dose-response relationships. |
Provisional Advisory Levels (PALs) for Hazardous AgentsHazardous substances released during a terrorist attack will contaminate the environment, but there are few health-based guidelines to support decisions on temporary occupancy of contaminated spaces or resumed use of spaces or water following a large-scale disaster. |
Protocols All Hazards Receipt FacilitiesThe Department of Homeland Security (DHS), with support from EPA, the Department of Defense (DoD), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL), recently developed and constructed All Hazards Receipt Facilities (AHRFs) for prescreening unknown and potentially hazardous samples collected under unusual or suspicious circumstances. |
Technology Performance Summaries for Detection InstrumentsThese technical briefs summarize the evaluation of commercially available screening technologies designed to rapidly detect, and in some cases indicate the concentration of, toxic industrial chemicals and chemical warfare agents in air, water, or surface samples. The technologies were specifically evaluated to see if they could detect chemicals that might be used during, or develop as a by-product from, a terrorist attack. |
Fumigant Technologies Used to Inactivate Biological Agents on Indoor MaterialsIn 2001, the anthrax mailings not only caused loss of life, but also interrupted the daily functioning of the United States government when affected buildings had to be taken out of service until decontamination and restoration efforts were complete. Because of these events and their consequences, EPA has evaluated the performance of several decontamination technologies designed specifically to inactivate biological agents. |
Determining the Impacts of Decontamination Technologies on Building MaterialsEPA is investigating decontamination technologies for restoring public buildings to a usable state after a terrorist contamination event. In the context of decontamination, contaminants of interest are those that can persist on indoor surfaces and can lead to a continuing chance of exposure long after the contamination event occurs. |
CANARY, Event Detection SoftwareAnomalous water quality results can indicate the onset of a contamination incident. For this reason, water utilities must be able to rapidly and accurately identify such results in water distribution systems. |
Threat Ensemble Vulnerability Assessment: Sensor Placement SoftwareWater distribution networks deliver drinking water to consumers through systems of pipes, valves, pumps, and tanks. Within these systems, sensors that can detect contaminants can be placed at various locations, such as fire stations, schools, hospitals, public buildings, publicly owned infrastructure, and even private homes. |
EPANET Extended to Include Multi-Species ModelingEPANET is used in homeland security research to model contamination threats to water systems. Historically, EPANET has been limited to tracking the dynamics of a single chemical transported through a network of pipes and storage tanks. EPANET did not consider interactions between bulk species in the water or the surface species fixed to the pipe wall. |
Tucson Water StudyTucson Water is an innovative and advanced municipal drinking water system that serves nearly 700,000 customers. Through an EPA Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking (EMPACT) grant, online monitors have been providing near real-time water quality data to the public for several years. |
Building RetrofitsTA new report provides owners, managers, engineers, and other decision makers with information about various building retrofit options that will improve building protection against airborne hazards. |
Chemical Wipe SamplingThe collection of surface contaminants, referred to as "wipe sampling," is an important technique for government agencies and the private sector to estimate contamination on a variety of surfaces, including those in buildings, homes, outdoor areas, and hands. |
Message MappingMessage mapping is a science-based risk communication tool that enables members of the emergency response and environmental protection communities to quickly and concisely deliver the most pertinent information about an emergency. |
Spray-Applied Sporicidal Decontamination Technology EvaluationAs part of EPA’s Office of Research and Development, the National Homeland Security Research Center rigorously tests technologies against a wide range of performance characteristics, requirements, and specifications under the Technology Testing and Evaluation Program. |
Sampling Radiochemical AnalytesA radiological sampling procedure is now available to environmental sampling teams assisting the EPA with characterizing, remediating, and determining the final status of a site following a radiological contamination event. |
Animal Disease and Agro-TerrorismEPA is conducting several projects concerning foreign animal disease (FAD) pathogens, agricultural terrorism, and agriculture disaster management. |
Online Water Quality MonitoringEPA is building upon and expanding current monitoring programs in order to develop robust, comprehensive, and fully coordinated surveillance and monitoring systems for water quality that provide early detection and awareness of disease, pest, or poisonous agents. |
Anthrax Spores on Indoor SurfacesBacterial endospores can survive in the environment for an extended time, and are resistant to a wide variety of treatments such as heat, desiccation, radiation, pressure, and chemicals. As potential bacterial spore decontaminants, ultraviolet light, γ-irradiation, wet/dry heat, ozone, aqueous solutions and mixtures, gels, and gases have been evaluated. |
Pilot-Scale Incinerator Destruction of Bacillus Anthracis SurrogatesBuilding decontamination after a biological warfare agent (such as Bacillus anthracis) release may produce substantial building decontamination residue such as ceiling tile, carpet, wallboard, concrete, and wood. These materials would be removed from the building either before or after decontamination efforts. |
Medical Waste Incineration of Microbiological OrganismsMany interior building materials will require disposal after a terrorist attack with a biological weapon such as anthrax (B. Anthracis). Research indicates that incineration may be the best option to destroy all potentially remaining bio-contaminants. |
Bio-Inactivation with UV Light DevicesOne potential method of terrorism is the intentional introduction of biological warfare agents (BWAs) into the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems of target structures in order to distribute pathogenic organisms. |
Extending Public Health Surveillance to Water QualitySophisticated computer programs are one type of tool available for monitoring changes in public health. The programs look for patterns in health-related data that indicate the appearance of a particular syndrome or set of symptoms in the population. Many cities and counties use these electronic public health syndromic surveillance (PHSS) system programs to help identify potential disease outbreaks early. |
Thermal Treatment of Building Decontamination ResidueThe building decontamination residues (BDRs) destined for disposal may be parts of a structure or its contents, or waste from the decontamination process. One way to deal with these BDRs is to incinerate them in combustion facilities; another is to use autoclaving with steam to disinfect them. EPA researchers are investigating how various materials and their contaminants behave during these two high-temperature treatments. |
Point-of-Use/Point-of-Entry Treatment DevicesPoint-of-use (POU) devices are designed to purify only that portion of incoming water that is being used for drinking and cooking purposes, while point-of-entry (POE) devices treat all the water coming into a house or facility. What are the capabilities of these devices for treating or capturing the most likely contaminants? |
Shelter-in-Place Guidelines Enhance Protection PotentialAn ongoing EPA study has confirmed the usefulness of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) guidelines for preparing in-house shelters as protection against airborne biological, chemical, or radioactive hazards. The DHS guidelines recommend that people create in-place shelters in their homes by using an interior room with few or no windows and sealing openings with plastic sheeting and duct tape. |
Anthrax Surrogates Used in Chlorine Inactivation StudyIn carrying out its responsibilities for protecting drinking water systems and sources, the NHSRC conducted research on the use of nonvirulent surrogates for Bacillus anthracis in inactivation studies involving chlorination. |
Threat Ensemble Vulnerability Assessment (TEVA) Computational FrameworkTo counter threats against water systems, EPA's National Homeland Security Research Center (NHSRC) is developing the Threat Ensemble Vulnerability Assessment (TEVA) program. This program uses a computational framework containing a suite of software tools that can simulate threats and identify vulnerabilities in drinking water distribution systems, measure potential public health impacts, and evaluate mitigation and response strategies. |
Workshop on Chemical, Biological, and Radiological DecontaminationEPA's National Homeland Security Research Center (NHSRC) held its first "Workshop on Decontamination, Cleanup, and Associated Issues for Sites Contaminated With Chemical, Biological, or Radiological Materials" at the International Trade Center Building in Washington, D.C., February 23–25, 2005. The workshop opened with a plenary session. |
EPA Explores Building Decontamination AlternativesIn September 2002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) created the National Homeland Security Research Center (NHSRC) within the Agency's Office of Research and Development (ORD). As one of the elements within NHSRC, the Safe Buildings Team has, as a key part of its responsibilities, engineering and economic analysis of alternative technologies and approaches for decontaminating buildings following an attack using chemical and biological (CB) agents. |
EPA Releases Guide for Water UtilitiesThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) National Homeland Security Research Center (NHSRC) has published Security Information Collaboratives: A Guide for Water Utilities. The purpose of the guide is to inform drinking water and wastewater utilities, and others, about the benefits of establishing collaborative arrangements with other organizations to share information on water security. |
Emissions from Combustion of Post-Consumer Carpet in a Cement KilnThe NHSRC, in collaboration with other government, academic, and private organizations, conducted a series of investigations on issues related to combustion of Building Decontamination Residues, such as carpeting. To broaden the usefulness of the research, issues were investigated both relating to the disposal of carpeting as building decontamination residue as well as the utilization of post-consumer carpeting as supplemental fuel for energy intensive industrial processes such as cement production. |
EPA Homeland Security Strategy In September 2002, EPA published a Strategic Plan for Homeland Security outlining the Agency's activities and initiatives through fiscal year 2005 in support of homeland security. The 2004 Homeland Security Strategy updates this earlier effort and furthers EPA's strategic planning process. Specifically, the update takes into consideration the Agency's available resources through fiscal year 2005, recent Presidential Directives and expectations, and the evolving role of the Department of Homeland Security. |
|  |